Explain what Jesus taught his first followers about the meaning of discipleship Essay Example

Explain what Jesus taught his first followers about the meaning of discipleship Essay We learn from Marks Gospel that there are several elements to discipleship: the call, the task and the cost. The word disciple means pupil or one who learns. A disciple tries to mould their lives to be like the teacher, in this case Jesus. The first thing we learn about discipleship is the call. The call was when Jesus sought out his disciples and called them over to him. There was an immediate response, showing that discipleship means to follow without second thoughts. Jesus called his chosen disciples and they left everything to be with him. Like when Jesus called over the two fishermen, Simion and his brother Andrew (Mark 1 vv 16-20) Jesus disciples were not rich or clever. Most were poor and uneducated. This shows another meaning to discipleship, everyone is welcome, anybody can be a disciple. The disciples were just ordinary working men showing that Jesus message is for all. We will write a custom essay sample on Explain what Jesus taught his first followers about the meaning of discipleship specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Explain what Jesus taught his first followers about the meaning of discipleship specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Explain what Jesus taught his first followers about the meaning of discipleship specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Not only did the disciples follow Jesus physically, they followed him spiritually as well. This means they were taught a new way of thinking and followed Jesus teachings. This is also another meaning of discipleship; to follow the teacher, Jesus, spiritually. An example of this is when Jesus speaks to James and John about being great (Mark 10 vv 35-45). The next thing we learn about discipleship is the tasks- mission (Mark 6 vv 7-13) and commission (Mark 16 vv 14-18). Their basic task was to preach the message as far and wide and to as many people as possible. The disciples were to do three things: 1) preach repentance 2) cast out devils 3) they were to cure the sick. Firstly the disciples were sent out on the mission. Jesus sent out his disciples two by two and they were to preach the word of God far and wide. They were sent out in twos, this shows that discipleship is dangerous and not to be taken for granted. They were given staffs to keep safe with, again outlining the danger of discipleship. The disciples were told by Jesus to wear sandals, normally they would have gone bare footed but they were to protect their feet from the long, rough roads. This shows that discipleship is a long and bumpy journey, with ups and downs. They were not to waste their time on the people who would not listen and therefore should move on somewhere else, this is because discipleship includes an immediate response and there should be no excuses. The disciples had to show faith that all their needs would be provided for. This shows that discipleship means showing faith. Next the disciples were sent out on the commission. Jesus sent out his disciples throughout the whole world preaching the word of God to everyone. This shows that discipleship means travelling and accepting orders. The disciples are assured that they will be able to perform miracles and speak strange tongues, this is important as it shows discipleship is for everyone. Next, we learn about the cost and rewards of discipleship. The job of a disciple was very difficult and very demanding so therefore came at a great cost. Disciples would give up their jobs and families just to be with Jesus. This shows another meaning of discipleship, to put God first. As a result, all the things they had given up, the disciples would receive one hundred times more in heaven, as a reward. One of Jesus phrases was to carry cross; this could mean either to death or just to put up with things that you may not be satisfied with. This shows that discipleship means to death or to the end. The disciples were to put up with all of the things they were not happy with and therefore would be rewarded in heaven. Another of Jesus phrases was follow me; Jesus meant for the disciples to follow him right to the end no matter what costs. This could also have meant for the disciples to stick by Jesus when he was being trialled and tortured. Jesus was teaching his disciples that the meaning of discipleship was to be loyal. Discipleship is a very difficult thing and some disciples were not happy by it, for example Peter was not happy and confronted Jesus and said he had given up everything follow him (Mark 10 vv 28-31). This story teaches that Discipleship is not easy but will be worthwhile at the end. Part 2 Describe and explain how Christians today can put this teaching into practice. (14 marks) Christians still attempt to follow what Jesus taught In the Bible. They have a call, a task, and the cost. An important part of discipleship is the call; many Christians today have a call. Some receive an actual voice from God informing them on how to lead their lives. But most receive a feeling or more of an instinct which can be described as a call. Anyone can be called, anyone from famous people to ordinary people, this shows that discipleship is for everyone. An example of a famous person is Mother Teresa. Missionaries, Priests and Vicars all claim to have been called at one point. A call needs an immediate response there must be no excuses. Modern Christians follow Jesus physically and spiritually. Christians today follow Jesus physically by going to church and giving to charity. They follow him spiritually by following his teachings and setting a good example. They are willing to learn. They should put others first, a good example of this is marriage because you start to put your partner and children before you. Just like how the first disciples had the mission and commission Christians today have a task. They spread the word of God as far and as wide as possible. This can be achieved by printing Bibles in different languages or by preaching in different languages, similar to how the first disciples spoke in strange tongues. The first disciples drove out demons, today Christians help heal the sick, and an example of this is the Samaritans. They educate the young on Jesus and his teachings either through Sunday Schools or Church Schools. Some people, like missionaries, feel their task is more vocal and try to spread the word of God all over the world. Jesus taught us to put God before possessions and nowadays people like missionaries like to carry as little as possible. The cost is the hardest part of discipleship, but will be worthwhile in the end. Missionaries give up their families and homes in order to go and preach the message. Charity workers give up their time and effort in order to do well and follow Jesus teachings. Most Christians give up their Sunday mornings to visit church and maybe a few pounds to the collection or charity box. Even today, in the 21st Century, Christians in foreign countries die for their belief. Christians today get called for their beliefs or for going to church or a church school. A part of Christian belief is Lent and Christians give up items. Although the cost is extremely difficultly it is more than repaid for by its rewards Missionaries and Vicars can sleep at night with the relief and satisfaction of knowing they have done good. Even when ordinary Christians donate a little money to charity a sense of self pride is achieved which can match up to any amount of money achieved by working. After a Christians life on Earth is over their rewards continue in heaven. Part 3 Every Christian should be ready to die for their faith Do you agree or Disagree. I believe Christians should be ready to die for their faith because Jesus died for Christians and Christians should follow in his footsteps and die for their faith too. Jesus warned his first disciples that they may have to die for their faith in Mark 8vv34 9vv1 and many did go on to do so like Peter, James and Paul for example. Jesus tells his disciples to take up their cross and follow him. This means to spiritually pick up a cross as if all ready knowing the consequences of their belief. In foreign countries like Pakistan or Sudan Christians are murdered and persecuted, people in more civilized areas of the world should use this as a role model and be prepared. Christians believe in the resurrection and feel they will encounter one also. If this is the case then if a Christian dies for their faith it is not the end and will be worthwhile and if all of the Christians decided against dieing for their faith then this shows that Christianity doesnt mean much and there will no longer be any faith. They live their lives for their faith by going to church and giving to charities and surely if all of this is worth living for it must be worth dieing for. Christians should not be ready to die for their faith because religious wars and battles over time and that still go on today see innocent people killed. All of the bloodshed and anger that is caused is not part of Christian belief and surely was not taught by Jesus. Jesus meant for a Christian to die spiritually not physically. He wanted them to give up all their old ways of living and make way for a new way. The followers of Islam have been taught to not fear death. If they are not showing respect for life and death this is a bad thing and we dont want Christians to be in the same situation. Dieing for ones faith produces nothing but trouble and needless deaths. This point is proven when we look at the situation in Northern Ireland when people are killing for their belief, and murdering is not in the bible. All the killing and crime produced only creates a feeling that religion is bad and should not be bothered with. Jesus is not saying you have to die but just to be prepared. Jesus taught us to live in peace and to spread the word. The word cannot be spread if youre dead. Jesus died for the future of Christianity. Why should Christians die for the same reason? In conclusion to this I feel Christians should NOT be prepared to die for their faith. I feel it achieves nothing but anger and heartache and leads to more needless deaths. Christians should follow their religion in other ways like going to church and spreading the word and should not be ready or preparing to die for what they feel is right.

Dawned vs. Donned

Dawned vs. Donned Dawned vs. Donned Dawned vs. Donned By Guest Author This is a guest post by Shelley DuPont. If you want to write for Daily Writing Tips check the guidelines here.    Did you ever think you knew the lyrics to a song, only to find out later they were nothing like you thought?   I know I have. Editor’s note: There’s a word for this kind of mishearing: mondegreen, â€Å"a misunderstood or misinterpreted word or phrase resulting from a mishearing, esp. of the lyrics to a song.† Sometimes a writer who has misunderstood an expression passes it on to the reader, with unintended results. For example, I came across a guest post on how conversations can lead indirectly to gaining more business for yourself.   Anticipating a great article, I eagerly started reading. Right at the end of the introductory paragraph, I saw it. It hit me like a small flaw on an expensive piece of clothing:   It donned on me The context called for it dawned on me, meaning I understood, I became aware of. Wanting to reassure myself that I hadnt been mistaken in my own understanding of the idiom, I googled the phrase as the author used it.   There it was at the top of the page. Google was asking, Do you mean It dawned on me?' Yes! Yes! I said with some relief.   But this still didnt answer the question as to why the author chose to use donned as the verb.    Used figuratively, the verb to dawn means â€Å"to begin to appear or become visible† in the sense of mental enlightenment or awareness.   If something dawns on you, then a new understanding has come your way.   This use seems fairly obvious, especially within the context of the article.   The verb to don, on the other hand, means to put on clothing, or, in a figurative sense, to assume, or to get into.   For example, a recent headline taken from the New York Times entertainment page reads, Amanda Seyfried likely to don â€Å"Red Riding Hood† I suppose the author could have done it deliberately. I did discover a website named itdonnedonme that focuses on competitive 24 hour film making. But the blog title is a deliberate pun on the expression it dawned on me and the blog owner’s name: Evan Donn. The context of the article I was trying to read definitely called for â€Å"dawned.† Maybe the error arose from the writer’s pronunciation of the words dawn and don. dawn [dà ´n] rhymes with lawn, yawn and aw (as in â€Å"Aw, shucks!) don [dÃ… n] rhymes with on, con and Ron At this point, I can only conclude that the author, like those of us singing the wrong words for years, has simply mixed up â€Å"dawn† and â€Å"don.†   By the way, it just dawned on me that I never did finish reading that article. Shelley DuPont is a former high school English teacher who blogs for local business owners. She actively tutors online ESL students, freelance writes, and paints. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Misused Words category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Avoid Beginning a Sentence with â€Å"With†Story Writing 101Double Possessive

Financial performance comparison Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Financial performance comparison - Essay Example The ROA of Brown-foreman was better than Anheuser Bush. Return on equity (ROE) when compared to return on assets, measures the extent to which financial leverage is working for or against common stockholders (Garrison & Noreen). Brown-foreman’s ROE of 32.43% was superior to the 20.83% return on equity of Anheuser Bush. The earnings per share (EPS) metric is the portion of a company’s profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock (Investopedia). The EPS of Anheuser Bush in 2014 was $5.54, while Brown-foreman had a lower EPS in the same period of $3.08. The current ratio shows the ability of a company to pay off its short term debt. A current ratio is considered good if is above the 1.0 threshold. Anheuser Bush had a current ratio of 0.62, while Brown-foreman had a current ratio of 1.02 in 2014. The working capital shows whether a company can pay off its current liabilities solely using its current assets. The working capital of Anheuser Bush was -$8,867 million, while Brown-forman had a working capital of $106 million. Based on these two ratios the liquidity of Brown-forman is superior of Anheuser Bush. The debt ratio shows how much leverage a company uses. In 2014 Anheuser Bush had a debt ratio of 0.62, a figure that is 0.12 higher than Brown-foreman. The desirable outcome is to have a lower debt ratio, thus Brown-foreman outperform Anheuser Bush in this financial metric. The inventory turnover shows how many times a company sold its inventory during a year. Anheuser Bush sold its inventory 6.31 times during 2014. Brown foreman only sold its inventory 1.04 times during the year. Average sale period measures the number of days taken to sell the inventory one time. It takes Anheuser Bush 57.88 days to sell its inventory, while it took Brown-foreman 352.61 days. The financial performance of both companies was good since both firms generated positive income during 2014. When comparing the

CH 11 - ISMG 3000 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

CH 11 - ISMG 3000 - Essay Example But at least, it would not jeopardize the whole credibility and viability of the business on a longer term framework. Besides, by shutting down the system, and trying to rush things into putting back normal operations within 3 or 4 days, the more that IT personnel might increase tendencies to commit mistakes and gravely endanger rushing the system back into full operations within a short time frame. One strongly believes that there is no need to disclose anything in the outside world given that IT personnel has not proven any form of intrusion, in the first place. The implications for making such a pre-emptive public announcement could cause chaos and undue stress to their customers which could actually compromise their corporate image. If eventually proven that no intrusion of any kind was actually encountered, it would be difficult to negate the previous public disclosure or announcement that was made. Barton still has a job since his overall performance as head of the IT department was in fact exemplary and extraordinary. It was really not his fault that there were chaos and security issues that emerged during his helm. His other undertakings as CIO have been commended considerably by Williams and by other members of his IT team which is indicative of his competence and extraordinary qualities and skills as a manager. As such, his strengths could be used favorably to contribute to the growth of IVK in the long run. One honestly shares the same contention that one’s immediate supervisor or boss needs to know the bad news first, even if it is just initially a hunch. Just like the strategy that was applied by Barton, he perfectly justified using this strategy to immediately relay the least palatable option in situations of problems or concerns so that the boss is evidently prepared and apprised of the worst scenario and would not be surprised that it could come to facing that particular course of action. This is consistent

Spirituality in Nursing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Spirituality in Nursing - Essay Example Pragmatically though it is nurses on the ward, rather than staff who only visit occasionally, and often only when requested, who are best placed to deal with this part of holistic nursing care. This is especially so where life-threatening illness is involved and there is much one to one interaction between nurse and patient. Thompson in 1993 spoke of the way in which by maintaining a bond with a distressed patient   the nurse is making an act   'unconditional love'.Even if their own beliefs are different from those of the patient, by being both good communicators and listeners, nurses can be supportive. They are often providing spiritual care simply be allowing the patient the opportunity to express themselves about beliefs and spiritual matters. Nurses have been encouraged to care for the whole person as a spiritual being,   as well as biological and psychological beings, since the 1970’s and books appeared such those by Roper, Logan and Tierney and their ‘Element s of Nursing’ each edition of which includes a chapter about dying and such things as grief and bereavement.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Spirit is someone's soul, so spirituality would be focused on the self, but focused on the self in a manner in which they can understand it more deeply than just standard cognitive thinking about it, so religion might help you understand yourself in that "higher" manner. That is, it is almost like faith to believe in yourself like that, so it is like religion. ... They are often providing spiritual care simply be allowing the patient the opportunity to express themselves about beliefs and spiritual matters. Nurses have been encouraged to care for the whole person as a spiritual being, as well as biological and psychological beings, since the 1970’s and books appeared such those by Roper, Logan and Tierney and their ‘Elements of Nursing’ each edition of which includes a chapter about dying and such things as grief and bereavement. Definitions of Spirituality Mark Pettinelli – Spirit is someone's soul, so spirituality would be focused on the self, but focused on the self in a manner in which they can understand it more deeply than just standard cognitive thinking about it, so religion might help you understand yourself in that "higher" manner. That is, it is almost like faith To believe in yourself like that, so it is like religion. Laburn ( 1988) 'That which inspires in one the desire to transcend the realm of the material', Living Words of Wisdom:- You are surrounded by spirituality every day. The definition of spirituality is that which relates to or affects the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things. Spirituality touches that part of you that is not dependant on material things or physical comforts Dictionary Definitions of Spirituality There is any number of variations on the subject of spirituality. It is defined most often as the quality or state of being spiritual. this doesn’t get you much further on unless you then look up what spiritual means. This, however, can be defined as simply to do with the spirit. It then follows that one must first of all define spirit.  

Hart Fuller Contrasting Points Positivism And Natural Law Philosophy Essay

Hart Fuller Contrasting Points Positivism And Natural Law Philosophy Essay In our daily life the law playing prominent roles. The law always prohibits, controls, regulates as how the society need to act and behave. In order to avoid from being charged from any penalty the society has to ought to follow the law or regulation by the government. Previously, the natural law which may come from morality, reason, God, or some other such source ruled the people. Whereby the natural law acts as positive law as there is existence of particular ideal principles or importance to which the positive law should be consistent if it is to be as genuine law. Moral concerns invade the law at every aspect. The inflexibility of distinction between morality and the law- even it is continue to analytical clarity-is, to natural lawyers, highly difficult to believe. The legal positivists search for a value free account of law is contradicts the claims by the natural lawyer which it is failed to do the very fundamental of law, its morality- that the act of positing lawà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ can and should be guided by moral principles and rules; that those moral norms are a matter of objective reasonableness, not of whim, convention, or mere decision.  [1]  It is simply means that the legislators need come up with law which needs to be comply with moral concerns and need with apply to all the situations rather than it is being a passing impulse, formal agreement between the people and government. As far we concern as long we have good law does not mean we can produce a good society. The inner morality must be there in each individual so only we can develop a good society. Example, we have law shop lifting in all shops, where the shop lifters need be handed to police. The securities of the shop duties to keep on eye on shop lifters. As they catch any shop lifters they not able to touch them or scold them to put back the things as they prohibits to do so by safety and health law. The shop lifters should know that is to not good ethics, which need to come from their mind. This cannot be forced by any law. The law just being guidance for our daily life, mainly our inner morality is important to our daily life. Each individuals need to think and rationalize things which is good or not. Based on our selected perspective Hart and Fuller debate demonstrated the contrasting points of positivism and natural law. Lon Fuller found for family resemblance in different types of natural theories especially on principles of social order  [2]  . I discern, and share, one central aim common to all schools of natural law, that of discovering those principles of social order which will enable men to attain a satisfactory life in common. He also assumed that in all principles of natural law it was assumed that the process of moral discovery is a social one, and that there is something akin to a collaborative articulation of shared purposes by which men come to understand better their own end to discern more clearly the means for achieving them. Fuller claiming that the basic belief of natural law is an affirmation of the role of reason in legal ordering  [3]  . Fuller says that there is necessary for the relation between morality and law. As we can see he implies the law with practical value. Fullers initial argument that a legal system on purposive human enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules. He simply means that the legal system had other objectives as well. In order a system of law to be qualified, the certain procedural objectives needs to be acknowledged as goals rather than being imply arbitrary force. A statute law (and other made law) were involved needs that they be sufficiently general (there must be rules); publicly promulgated; sufficiently prospective; clear and intelligible; free of contradictions; sufficiently constant through time so that people can order their relation according; not require the impossible; and be administered in a way sufficiently congruent with their wording so that people can abide by them  [4]  . These principles he described as an internal morality of law as they implyin g the concept of law. It also can be called as morality because they come up with standards for examining official conduct. If the legislators make rules which are not possible to obey by citizens it will lead to failure in making the law. In the event it will result in something bad law but not law at all. We can say that the law not reflecting a system of rules which is completely incapable of guiding conduct of legal system In order the system to be acknowledge as law it must essentially follow standard with principles of legality, and since according to Fuller he supports for particular moral values. It follows that we cannot describe the nature of law without resource to moral concepts. The concepts of legality are laws inner morality or resource to moral concepts. In Fuller point of view the Nazi Germany law can distinct from the ideal legal morality as Nazi law is created based applying things that have happened in the past. Fuller believes that if the legislators follow the procedural ideas which are create into the idea of law they more likely to provide good laws. He goes on to say that rest on the assertion of a belief that may seem naÃÆ' ¯ve, namely that coherence and goodness have more affinity than coherence and evil (Fuller, 1958, p 636). For when men are compelled to explain and justify their decision towards goodness ( Fuller,1958, p 636)à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦.ask lohitha. H.L.A Harts Concept of Law (1961) is made research on connection between law, coercion, and morality. it is just a trial to answer the question whether all the law may be appropriately conceptualized as coercive orders or as moral commands. There is no need of link between law and coercion or between the law and morality says by Hart. He explain that to categorized all law as coercive orders or as moral commands is to oversimplify the relation between law, coercion, and morality. He further expands that to conceptualize all laws as coercive orders or as moral commands is to enforce a deceptive existence of uniformity on different types of laws and different types of social purposes which law may perform. He claims that to describe that all law as coercive orders is to mischaracterize that purpose and function of some law and is to misunderstand their content, mode of origin, and range of application. Simply means that the law supposes to imply to all citizen according to purposes or objectives of law rather than being arbitrary force. Hart says that primary rules of obligation which is the law enforces law or obligation towards individuals. For system of primary rules to work effectively, secondary rules may also be necessary in order to provide an authoritative statement of all the primary rules. If the primary rules seem to be incomplete or inadequate there is opportunity for the legislators me by can update the law in secondary rules. The secondary rules become very important when the courts utilizes to resolves any issues arise over interpretation and application of it. The secondary rules of a legal system may thus include 1) rules of recognition, 2) rules of change, and 3) rules of adjudication. If the rules are clear, not ambiguous and understandable to all individuals then only the primary rules of legal system can be run effectively. If it not so it may create uncertainty on obligations which they imposed to individuals. In secondary rules of legal system may also leads to uncertainty where there vagueness and ambiguity as to whether courts have legal authority over disputes relating to interpretation and applications of laws. Hart asserts that primary rules of obligation are not in themselves sufficient to establish of a system of law that can be formally recognized, changed, or adjudicated. Where it means that primary rules solely not able to provide a good law which can useful for all individuals. The primary rules need to work together with secondary rules from the initial stage of legislation. The combination of primary and secondary rules can acknowledge a legal system (although Hart does not claim that this union is the only valid criterion of a legal system or that a legal system must be described in these terms in order to be properly defined). Hart divided external and internal ideas on how the rules of a legal system may be explained or judged. The external idea can be said that where an observer who does not need to follow the rules of legal system. They can able to judge the scope of the rules of the legal system cause something in usual form of conduct on the part of individuals to whom the rules apply. Contrast with internal point of view, where individual who are regulated by the rules of the legal system and who obey the rules as normal of conduct. Harts discussion can make conclusion in such way that we cannot understand law other than as a standard practice, as a practice which uses the standard vocabulary of ought to, entitled to and only legal statement are practical.

Hybrid Cars :: essays research papers

Hybrid Cars There are two configurations for hybrid cars. The first configuration uses gasoline engine to run a generator. The generator supplies electricity to the motor, which drives the wheels, which allows the gasoline engine to run constantly while achieving optimum fuel efficiency. This thereby minimizes emissions owing to incomplete combustion. A hybrid car with parallel configurations uses both an engine and a motor to drive the wheels depending on driving conditions. "A hybrid car is an automotive equipped with two or more sources of motive energy" (http://www.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car1.htm). Hybrid cars use both gas and electric. The gasoline engine is the primary source of power, while the electric motor is used at low speeds. Emissions levels are reduced because the gasoline engine shuts off at low speeds. An additional benefit of the parallel configuration is that no outside source of electric power is required because the engine itself generates the required electricity. A Hybrid Electric Vehicle known as HEV have several advantages over traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles: Regenerative braking capability, which helps minimize the energy lost when driving. Engine is sized to average load, not peak load, which reduces the weight of the engine. Fuel efficiency is greatly increased, while emissions are greatly decreased. HEVs can be operated using alternative fuels; therefore they need not be depended on fossil fuels (http://www.ott.doe.gov/hev/what.html#hev). Another great thing about these machines is the mpg; on the average, a hybrid car gets anywhe re from 55-70mpg on the hwy. This is what makes the car all worth having. Now all this sounds good, but there are some issues that must be addressed. First of all the prices must come down. The prices for hybrid cars are naturally higher because there are no existing facilities for mass production and both engine and electric motor must be installed. Another downfall is the lack of infrastructure for repair and maintenance. Many of the mechanical problems occurring with the hybrid cars may not be repairable at existing service stations.